Thursday, May 9, 2013

Preliminary Budget Passes



On Monday, the Board passed a preliminary budget for the 2013-2014 school year.  Pennsylvania requires that school districts vote on the budget twice and that there be at least a 30 day time period between votes.  This is the reason that the first vote is considered a preliminary vote. 

The budget for the 2013-2014 totals $49,305,888.00.  This is an increase of $632,572 (1.3%) over the current budget.  The district saved over $800,000.00 by not replacing 7 retiring teachers and one central office administrator.  Since the 2007-2008 school year, the school district has trimmed teaching staff by 33 positions.  The loss of teaching staff parallels the school district's declining enrollment.  I know there is a lot of discussion in the media concerning the teacher pension issue.  Fortunately for the school district, the Board started planning for this event years ago by putting money aside for the sharp increases in contributions that the district will realize in the upcoming years.  There is now more than $2,000,000.00 in the pension fund.  With that being said, the school district has not started to use the fund yet.   As a matter of fact, our budget projections indicate that with retirement projections and the natural increase in State funding the district will be able to withstand the pension increases (hopefully) without ever using the pension fund; kudos to the Board and Administration when they started to plan for this eventuality a few years ago.  The budget that was passed on Monday does not include a property tax increase.  The Board will discuss whether they feel it is beneficial to start adding millage to the renovation project.  Currently, the Board has 10 mils available for building renovation and they will discuss the merits (or demerits) of slowly adding millage to that figure over the next few years starting at the meeting on Monday, May 13th.  

The budget can be viewed from our web site or people can come to the administrative offices and view a hard copy.  In addition, the budget presentation that was presented to the Board can be found here.

Thursday, April 25, 2013

The Common Core and Penn-Trafford



I have been asked by a few people to explain what the Common Core standards are and what impact they have on Penn-Trafford.  The answer will fall under the title “a long answer to a short question”.  I will not offer my opinion about the Common Core or the standards system in general, but will only provide the facts.  It is important to realize that academic standards have been around for a while and that they are embedded into the structure of Pennsylvania schools.

The Standards and the PSSA Exam
The first thing to remember is that Pennsylvania has had official academic standards for more than 15 years.  These standards serve as the foundation for the PSSA Exams.  In other words, our students are tested on how well they have been taught the Pennsylvania Academic Standards. The link to the PA standards is: http://www.pdesas.org/Standard/VerticalStandard, and http://www.pdesas.org/Standard/Views.   Even more importantly, the rankings for school districts across the State are based on how well students perform on the PSSA tests.  Since the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act in 2002 (known by its moniker “No Child Left Behind” or NCLB) schools and school districts are categorized and punished (some would say shamed) according to how well (or poorly) their students perform on the PSSA Exams (students in grades 3-8 and grade 11 are tested).  NCLB created 4 categories that students (and schools and school districts) would be categorized based on the results of the PSSA Exam.  These categories are “advanced”, “proficient”, “basic” and “below basic”.  NCLB set a goal that 100% of students in America would be considered either “advanced” or “proficient” in Reading and Math by 2014.  To encourage schools to meet that goal, targets for performance were created that increased every year; if a school met these targets then you realized something  called “Adequate Yearly Progress” (AYP) (http://paayp.emetric.net/Home/About). For example, in 2013 the target that schools must meet to reach AYP is 89% advanced or proficient in Math and 91% advanced or proficient in Reading.  NCLB also required that different “subgroups” of students meet the same targets of proficiency; so different minorities, the lower economic status students and special needs student’s scores aggregated together must also meet these requirements.  If a subgroup does not meet the requirements then the school (or district) is labeled as not meeting AYP.  There are 40 different subgroups.  To have a subgroup a school must have at least 40 students categorized into the subgroup.  I have veered off into “PSSA land” because it is important to note that Pennsylvania has had academic standards for a long time and that those standards are the basis for the PSSA Exams.

The Origins of The Common Core
As the 2000’s unfolded politicians and some education policy makers became frustrated that different States had different levels of rigor in their standards.  Thus, it was difficult to compare children across different States as they took their State’s exams.  Pennsylvania has one of the more rigorous standard systems as compared to other States in the Union.  Therefore, a Pennsylvania student may be classified as “proficient” but know more than a student classified as “advanced” in another State.  The solution that was developed for this problem (for good or ill) is something called “The Common Core”.  The Common Core standards are standards developed nationally (not by the Federal Government, by the way) and States are encouraged to adopt them as their own.  This would (theoretically) “even out” the different levels of rigor between States. Currently only 5 States in the Union have not adopted the Common Core Standards.  Pennsylvania adopted the standards in July of 2010 and schools have been forced to realign their curriculum to meet the slightly different requirements of The Common Core versus the old Pennsylvania Standards. Information about the Common Core can be found at: http://www.corestandards.org/. Information about the Pennsylvania Common Core can be found at:  http://www.pdesas.org/Standard/CommonCore. The Common Core currently has standards for Math and English/Language Arts. 

The Keystone Exams
Pennsylvania has also started to replace the 11th grade PSSA test with something called “end of course” exams.  These exams are called “Keystone Exams”.  Currently, the class of 2017 must pass a Keystone Exam in Algebra I, Literature, and Biology.  Eventually, English Composition and Civics and Government will be added to the list of mandatory tests. The Keystone Exams are based on the Pennsylvania Common Core Standards.  Schools, school districts and students are categorized (for AYP purposes) based on student results on the Keystone Exam.  To graduate from high school a student must pass these Keystone Exams or an alternate project approved by the school district and the State.  Penn-Trafford gave the Math and Literature Keystone Exams as required by school code this winter.

Penn-Trafford and The Common Core
In the past, Penn-Trafford aligned our curriculum to the State Standards.  This was done so our children would do well on the PSSA Exams which are based on the State Standards.  By aligning we mean that we make sure the curriculum at minimum covers what will be on the test. When our staff compared The Common Core with what we have currently in our curriculum (which is based on the PA Academic Standards) there were no significant changes or additions.  It is the school district’s responsibility (and obligation) to our students to help make them successful by passing the Keystone Exams to graduate from high school.  Imagine if our school system did not prepare students to meet the requirements of graduation set forth by the State; we would be negligent in our duties. 

I have been asked what the financial impact of The Common Core has been on the school district; the answer is that it has been negligible.  Teachers have been given time to make sure the standards students will be tested on are in our curriculum and some staff have attended conferences to try to keep up to date about graduation requirements put forth by the State regarding Keystone Exams. The district will have two trainings for teachers on May 3rd that are tangentially related to The Common Core.  The titles of the first workshop is "Reading and writing informational texts"which will define what informational texts are and give them ideas for including informational texts in their classroom.  The second workshop is entitled "Lessons in Logic: Constructing strong arguments" which will give teachers ideas to help move students from persuasive writing to constructing more logical arguments in their writing.

I have also been asked about our textbooks and how they are influenced by The Common Core.  First, it is important to note that Penn-Trafford was very smart a few years ago to develop a cycle where money was budgeted every year to purchase textbooks.  Every year different subject areas at different levels (high school, middle school and elementary) sit down and determine what textbook (or other resources) they need to create engaging lessons for our students.  As I will discuss later, our teachers are moving away from a teaching model based on the textbook as the center of instruction and moving to an instructional model of creativity, collaboration and engagement.   With that being said, textbook companies are making sure that their books are aligned with The Common Core.  This means the textbooks “cover” The Common Core Standards.  Here at Penn-Trafford, our teachers have been moving away from the use of textbooks and are using them as only one resource.  As a matter of fact, in the last two textbook purchasing cycles for Middle level English, Social Studies, and Math, teachers have chosen not to purchase textbooks and instead have used the budgeted money to purchase instructional technology that allows students to collaborate and be creative in the classroom.

I hope this long answer can answer some questions that are arising in the community.  The Common Core is just the latest iteration of academic standards that the State has had in place for a while.  No matter how one may feel about the legitimacy of The Common Core Standards, our schools are required by law to follow the guidelines put forth by the State and make sure our students can meet those guidelines and graduate with a diploma.

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

The High School Building Project



Wow!  I have been derelict in my responsibility to write blog posts.  I have never gone a month without writing a post until now.  I will try to do better in the upcoming months.  One of the reasons that I have not blogged as much is because my schedule has started to get more hectic.  This is a result of the natural “rhythm” of this time of year as the District starts to plan for the upcoming year and budget discussions are underway.  However, I do want to discuss one task that has started to carve out a lot of my time lately…the high school building project.  The School Board made a decision last Fall to make needed repairs and renovations to the high school.  This project can be viewed through three different lenses: financial, educational, and maintenance.

Maintenance
               The decision to start a building project at the high school was made because the high school is the largest (and most used) building in the school district.  On almost every night during the school year there are school and community groups using the building for an activity.  In effect, the high school building is the “showcase” building for the school district because there is so much community traffic going through it.  The high school went through a renovation project 20 years ago and that project dealt with items that needed to be addressed at the time.  During that time, the “behind the wall” infrastructure was fine and did not need to be addressed.   However, now we find ourselves in a situation where we must address these issues if we want the building to stay functional.  The piping, electrical, and HVAC are all reaching the end of their useful lives (they have been in use for 40 years).  The School Board’s number one concern is to take care of the infrastructure needs of the building so that the building can continue to service the community safely for another 40 years.  Although the public may not see these repairs, the building will function much more efficiently because these repairs are undertaken.  A large portion of the budget for the renovation will include these repairs.

Education
               This project also comes at a time when education is undergoing a significant change.  The challenge for the school district is to create a learning space that will be flexible enough to accommodate new learning trends.  The future of education will require educational spaces that encourage collaboration between students and students and students and faculty.  In addition, the high school of the future will start to take on a look of a college campus with students coming and going more frequently as their schedules become more flexible.  We also must be cognizant of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) initiatives and encourage our students in these areas with state of the art STEM facilities within our high school.  

Financial
               The school district will be paying off its debt service (from the last building project 20 years ago) in 2015.  Presently, the school district has about 10 mils set aside to pay the bonds from the last building project.  As the old debt “comes off” the books, the School Board has decided to “rollover” some of that into a new debt structure to pay for a project.  The Board has already sold $10,000,000.00 in bonds to start putting money aside for the project. This was done at this level because interest rates are actually better for the school district when you can sell bonds in increments of $10,000,000 or less (it seems counter-intuitive, but that is the way it works). The Construction Manager for the district will share with the Board the estimated cost of the project in the coming months.  The Board will then sell bonds to finance the rest of the project.  Currently, the interest rates are at historic lows in the bond market which is nice moving forward.  Additionally, the school district has structured the bond payment on the new debt to start when the old debt is paid off. 

I will keep you updated on events surrounding the building project as they arise.